
Rules
Part of Federal grants explained: who may apply, where to look, and what follows
Federal Grant Review: How to Check Claims and Offers
Use this federal grant review to run six checks, verify claims through Grants.gov, SAM.gov and agency offices, spot payment scams, and report suspected fraud.
Use this federal grant review when something reaches you: an email, a call, a message from a stranger who says a fund selected you, or an advertisement. It could be a consultant's pitch or a listing on an unknown site.
This page is a procedure for deciding what it is; run it in order and stop at the first failure. Early checks are cheap; later ones cost hours.
What to take away
- Provenance first. Check Grants.gov and the relevant agency's official grants office; if the claim cannot be verified there, nothing else about it matters.
- A legitimate award may require matching funds or project spending, but no fee should be required to access an application or release an award. A promise of approval in exchange for a fee is a clear fraud signal.
- Unsolicited contact about money you never applied for is not an opportunity, whatever agency name is attached.
- Most things that pass the review are still not worth applying for. Passing means real, not suitable.
Check 1: can you find it at the source, without following their link
Open a new window and search the program on Grants.gov and the relevant agency's official grants office. Examples include the Small Business Administration (SBA), the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Department of Agriculture (USDA). Find the notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) and follow its instructions; for most federal applicants, a Unique Entity ID (UEI) and active registration in SAM.gov are required.
Check 1: Verify at the source
Search the program on the agency's own domain?
Real opportunity, continue checks
Stop, treat as fraud
A real agency initiative should be verifiable through the agency's official site or grants office, with the NOFO providing the program details and application instructions. If a program's only trace is the message, aggregator pages, and social posts, the review is finished.
Links inside the message prove nothing, because the link is the part the sender controls. Check the exact federal .gov domain yourself rather than trusting a lookalike. The FTC's guidance on government grant scams and the grant fraud information on Grants.gov explain common patterns.
Check 2: which direction is the money moving
Check 2: Money direction
- Application fee
- Processing fee
- Verification fee
- Insurance or taxes
- Deposit to release funds
- Subscription to see listing
- Retainer for guaranteed approval
Federal agencies do not charge an application or award-release fee. Applying through Grants.gov, obtaining a UEI, and registering in SAM.gov are free; check the NOFO for the program's application instructions.
A consultant may charge for optional services, but no third party can charge to unlock official application access or guarantee federal approval. The FTC's guidance on government grant scams explains how to test an offer before you pay anyone.
Check 3: did you start this conversation
Federal grants generally follow an application to an identified opportunity. A message claiming that you won money despite never applying is a strong fraud signal, even if it uses a real agency's name; verify any legitimate application contact through the agency's official site.
Check 3: Who started it
You applied
- Origin
- You initiated
- Channel
- Official process
- Meaning
- Normal
They contacted you
- Origin
- Out of the blue
- Channel
- Text, DM, phone
- Meaning
- Impersonation
The same logic covers the softer version: a caller who says they are checking whether you received your allocation, or that a fund has been set aside pending confirmation of your details. There is no allocation. The call exists to collect identity or payment details.
Check 4: what is the instrument, actually
Assuming the thing is real, find out what it is before you value it. Confirm whether it is a grant, cooperative agreement, procurement contract, loan, or loan guarantee; for federal financial assistance, read 2 CFR Part 200, the Uniform Guidance, along with the NOFO and agency award terms. Ask directly whether any part is repayable, when payment happens, and to whom it is paid.
Check 4: What is the instrument
Reimbursement
- When paid
- After you spend
- To whom
- You, later
- Repayable
- No
Tax credit
- When paid
- On tax return
- To whom
- Tax authority
- Repayable
- No
Voucher
- When paid
- To provider
- To whom
- Approved provider
- Repayable
- No
Cash in advance
- When paid
- Up front
- To whom
- You, now
- Repayable
- No
Check 5: who benefits from you believing this
For advertising and consultants, ask what the business model is: a page that gives away opportunity information and charges for writing has an honest model. A page that charges for the information itself is charging you for something published.
Check 5: Who benefits
Honest model
- Charges for
- Writing or help
- Before showing
- Nothing
- Eligibility button
- Application
Lead collection
- Charges for
- The information
- Before showing
- Revenue, phone, time
- Eligibility button
- Financing broker
A page that collects your revenue, phone number, and time in business before showing you anything is selling you as a lead. The eligibility button usually leads to a financing broker, not an application.
Check 6: is it worth your time even if it is genuine
Most reviews should end here, yet this is the check people skip. Read eligibility definitions literally, price the work of applying, and review what the award requires afterward.
Plenty of real programs are a bad trade for a small business once reporting, matching, and restrictions are counted. Deciding that early is a result, not a failure. It gets easier after you see the patterns that sink otherwise reasonable applications.
If you have already paid
Stop sending money now, even a final payment labeled the last step. Contact your bank or card issuer and ask what recovery is possible for your payment method; the answer depends heavily on how and when you paid.
Keep every message, receipt, and phone number. Report suspected scams to the FTC at ReportFraud.ftc.gov and, if the contact or payment was online, to the FBI's Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3). You can also contact your state attorney general or state consumer protection office; for suspected misuse of an actual federal award, contact the awarding agency's Office of Inspector General. The False Claims Act may apply to knowingly false claims involving federal funds.
Then treat any follow-up offering to recover your money as the second stage of the same scam. Recovery services that approach victims are how the same list gets sold twice.
A quick reference
| Signal | What it means |
|---|---|
| Fee of any label before or after an award | Fraud, without exception |
| Guaranteed approval offered by a third party | Fraud |
| Contact about money you did not apply for | Impersonation |
| Program invisible on the funder's own site | Unverified, treat as absent |
| Details demanded before any funder is named | Lead collection |
| Pressure to decide today | Sales technique, not a deadline |
Common questions
A real agency name and logo appeared in the message. Both are trivial to copy. Verify the opportunity on Grants.gov or the agency's official grants office, and use a contact route you found there, never the one in the message.
The listing looked professional. Presentation is the cheapest part of a scam. Provenance and the direction of payment are what the review turns on.



![Complete assignment is listed as: Subject: Press conference, [on the steps of the U.S. Capitol], announcing the final list of National Park Centennial Challenge projects [to be funded in 2008.] Secretary Dirk Kempthorne [joined National Park Service Director Mary Bomar, Assistant Secretary for Fish. Nine federal grant mistakes that quietly drain a season](/covers/federal-grant-mistakes-640.webp?v=96566287)



